Web Trader MT5 
Have you ever thought about how two funds that claim to be tracking the global markets could behave differently at times in a very pronounced way? In most cases, the fund itself is not the answer. It is the index below.
The two largest indexes of world brands are FTSE and MSCI. When investors see them in fund names, most do not inquire about what they are or how they differ. It’s important to close that gap, since the index a fund monitors affects everything from which countries you invest in to how emerging markets are handled and, ultimately, how your portfolio performs over time.
This is not a matter of choosing a winner. You need not decide between FTSE vs MSCI. They are index providers, meaning they are the benchmarks the funds track. To properly grasp how they differ, you need to know what’s in the funds you’re comparing.
Quick Answer
- FTSE and MSCI are index providers, meaning they create benchmarks but not investment products.
- Both make global equity indexes that funds and ETFs use worldwide.
- The main things that set them apart are their methods, their market classification, and their coverage rules.
- Each provider can put the same country in multiple groups, which affects the index composition.
- Two “global” funds can behave differently simply because they track different providers’ indices.
- When evaluating a fund, the provider’s name is less important than the index coverage.
FTSE vs MSCI: What Is the Difference?
FTSE and MSCI are both index providers, but they use different methods to sort markets, select firms, and construct their global indexes.
That difference in methods is what causes most of the differences investors see when they look at funds that both say they have global exposure. Different ways to get there, but the same goal: to show the world’s equity markets.
What Are FTSE and MSCI?
FTSE and MSCI are groups that establish and maintain stock market indexes that funds and ETFs worldwide use as benchmarks.
FTSE makes indexes that cover markets in countries, regions, and around the world. MSCI creates stock indexes that are extensively used in developed, emerging, and frontier markets. Neither of them is an investment product; they are the rules that investment products must obey.
They have a lot of power. FTSE and MSCI are two of the biggest index providers in the world. Their decisions about how to classify assets are important to investors, as they affect trillions of dollars in investment.
Funds that track an index have to change when a provider moves a country from emerging to developed, or vice versa.
FTSE vs MSCI: Key Differences
The FTSE and MSCI indexes differ in how each provider constructs, sorts, and maintains its benchmarks.
Index Methodology
Various providers do not have the same rules for choosing companies or for assigning weight to each company. That includes the minimum market capitalization required to be considered for an index, how to join or leave an index, and the frequency of index review and rebalancing.
These are not minor technical details; they determine what will be in the index and how much will be included.
Market Classification
This is where the disparities really start to show. FTSE and MSCI do not necessarily agree on whether a country is a developed market or an emerging market. One provider might consider one country, and another might claim it’s emerging. This would alter the composition of the index and, by extension, the fund’s exposure.
Country Treatment
Different providers have rather different approaches to certain countries. That influences the areas an investor is exposed to, the weight those areas have on the index, and how the index will respond to changes in those markets’ conditions.
Coverage Breadth
Minor variations in classification and coverage may vary the level of exposure of an index to specific economies or sectors. The same index may be referred to as global, but its underlying portfolio may differ significantly.
Why Do Similar Global Funds Behave Differently?
Most of the behavioral changes are due to one fund monitoring an FTSE index while the other tracks an MSCI index.
It’s not that one fund is run better than the other. It’s that they are using various plans.
There are different ways to include countries, treat emerging markets, and weight funds. This is why MSCI vs FTSE comparisons come up so often among investors trying to understand why they perform differently, even when they seem comparable.
How Do FTSE and MSCI Treat Developed and Emerging Markets?
Both providers cover developed and emerging economies, but they don’t always group countries in the same way, which makes a difference.
The most obvious illustration of this is how some countries are grouped. One provider would say a market is mature based on its liquidity and regulation, while the other might say it is still emerging based on other factors. That variation in classification affects:
- The index’s risk profile
- The exposure to growth that investors get
- The total diversity of the region
Emerging markets are a big part of the global equities opportunities. How much of that opportunity ends up in a provider’s indexes depends on where they draw the line between emerging and developed.
FTSE vs MSCI: Does Coverage Affect Diversification?
Yes, the fact that each index contains different things can have a big effect on how diversified a fund really is.
More regional exposure and a broader range of economic drivers usually signify broader coverage. But bigger isn’t always better. Adding more emerging markets to an index introduces new risk factors and increases diversification.
An investor’s goals and risk tolerance, not which provider built the index, will determine whether that trade-off is good for them.
FTSE vs MSCI Comparison: Where Do Investors Usually Notice the Difference?
The FTSE vs MSCI difference is most evident when comparing funds that seek to cover the world broadly.
Global Equity Funds
Here, the differences in total market exposure are evident, particularly in which countries are included and how developing markets are weighted.
Developed-Market Funds
This category has a few differences. Even developed-market indexes across providers vary, due to differences in methodology, such as company selection and weighting.
All-World and ACWI-Style Funds
This is the point at which the comparison is most evident. Broader mandates amplify the effects of classification and coverage variations; i.e., investors seeking global exposure must select their provider wisely.
FTSE vs MSCI: Does Methodology Affect Performance?
Yes, variations in how indexes are constructed can cause performance to change over time, especially when markets that are classified differently perform well or poorly.
The two indexes start to differ when an emerging market that one provider includes and the other does not has a strong run. The same thing happens in reverse when it doesn’t do well.
Neither method is inherently better than the other. They show multiple ways to define and measure global markets, and the discrepancies in performance are a natural result of those structural decisions.
Which Matters More: The Provider Name or the Index Coverage?
Index coverage matters far more than the provider name.
The provider’s name tells you who created the index. The coverage tells you what’s really in it. The content of the index is what matters to investors deciding how to allocate their money, how much risk to take, and what their long-term plan should be.
Before you choose a fund, you should ask yourself: Does this index encompass developing markets? How many countries does it cover? Does that coverage match what I’m attempting to achieve?
The answer to those questions counts more than whether FTSE or MSCI is in the fund name.
What Related Comparisons Should Investors Check Next?
Two closely related comparisons can make it clearer how different index frameworks perform in real life.
MSCI World vs FTSE All-World
This comparison is based on one main structural difference: MSCI World covers only developed economies, whereas FTSE All-World covers both developed and emerging markets. It’s a good place to start to learn about the scope differences.
FTSE All-World vs MSCI ACWI
Both indices aim to cover a wide range of countries worldwide, including emerging economies, but they use different methods for constructing their indices and classifying countries. A separate but related comparison worth exploring if you’re evaluating broad global funds.
What Should Investors Check Before Choosing a Fund?
The index underneath a fund is just as important as the fund itself. Here’s what to look at before you invest.
A useful list:
- Which index does the fund follow: FTSE or MSCI? And which index within that family?
- Are emerging markets part of the index, and if so, how are they weighted?
- How wide is the coverage for businesses and countries?
- What is the fund’s cost structure?
- Does the index’s range align with your diversification goals and time frame?
The choice of index has a bigger effect on long-term diversification than on short-term performance disparities. Being clear about this ahead of time will help save a lot of confusion later.
Frequently Asked Questions
Both are index providers that build stock market benchmarks worldwide, but use different methodologies, classification rules, and coverage criteria, so their indexes are not the same even when they focus on the same market.
Neither is necessarily superior. They define and measure world markets using various frameworks. The question of interest is which index has better coverage and a structure that fits your investment objectives.
They differ in their market classifications, inclusion criteria, and rules of construction (all of which influence what makes it into the index).
Yes, and this is one of the greatest practical differences. Even though one provider might consider a country developed and the other emerging, there could be a significant change in index composition.
Yes, coverage variations affect regional exposure, the inclusion of emerging markets, and the index’s responsiveness to global conditions.
MSCI World comprises developed markets. FTSE All-World covers both developed and emerging markets and thus is more comprehensive.
They both incorporate emerging markets but differ in country classification and index composition; they are similar in mandate but not identical in composition.
Put more emphasis on what the index actually contains: exposure to emerging markets, country coverage, and whether the coverage fits your investment objectives or not, and not the name of the provider alone.
Final Thoughts
FTSE vs MSCI isn’t really a head-to-head competition. It is a comparison of the two approaches to defining and measuring global equity markets, each with its own methodology, classification rules, and coverage choices.
The practical implication for investors is simple: the provider’s name on a fund tells you less than the index structure below it. Two funds may both have global exposure but have very different portfolios by chance, because their providers’ differing regulations govern them.
Knowing that difference will allow you to ask better questions, compare funds more appropriately, and create a more accurate picture of what your portfolio actually holds, which is a better starting point than pursuing a name.
Product Availability Notice:
This content is provided for general educational purposes only. The indexes (such as FTSE and MSCI) and any index-tracking funds or ETFs referenced in this article are not offered directly by the company. They are mentioned solely for educational comparison purposes. Clients should refer to the company’s official CFD product offering for available instruments.
Risk Disclaimer
This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investments carry risk, including the potential loss of capital. Past performance is not indicative of future results. You should consider your financial circumstances and seek independent professional advice where appropriate.
CFD Risk Warning:
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You may lose more than your initial investment. You should ensure you fully understand how CFDs work and consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Tags
Open Live Account
Please enter a valid country
No results found
No results found
Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid verification code
1. 8-16 characters + numbers (0-9) 2. blend of letters (A-Z, a-z) 3. special characters (e.g, !a#S%^&)
Please enter the correct format
Please tick the checkbox to proceed
Please tick the checkbox to proceed
Important Notice
STARTRADER does not accept any applications from Australian residents.
To comply with regulatory requirements, clicking the button will redirect you to the STARTRADER website operated by STARTRADER PRIME GLOBAL PTY LTD (ABN 65 156 005 668), an authorized Australian Financial Services Licence holder (AFSL no. 421210) regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.
CONTINUEImportant Notice for Residents of the United Arab Emirates
In alignment with local regulatory requirements, individuals residing in the United Arab Emirates are requested to proceed via our dedicated regional platform at startrader.ae, which is operated by STARTRADER Global Financial Consultation & Financial Analysis L.L.C.. This entity is licensed by the UAE Capital Market Authority (CMA) under License No. 20200000241, and is authorised to introduce financial services and promote financial products in the UAE.
Please click the "Continue" button below to be redirected.
CONTINUEError! Please try again.
